|
<<
Back to Main
Rheumors Page
Rheumors Volume 4, Number 2: April, 1993
POINTS
ON JOINTS
By Norman S. Koval, M.D.
FOREIGN
BODY INDUCED JOINT INFLAMMATION
The
penetration of a foreign body into a joint, tendon sheath
or the soft tissue surrounding the joint may cause a single
joint (monoarticular) synovitis. Synovitis is the inflammation
of the lining of a joint or tendon. The foreign bodies
most commonly described in association with this inflammation
include different plant thorns, wood splinters, and sea
urchin spines. All of these may easily break inside a
joint cavity causing inflammation. Other less frequently
found agents for foreign body synovitis are fish bones,
silica, silicon, metals, plastics, rubber, glass or gravel.
Patients with silicon or metallic prostheses (artificial
joints) may develop synovitis due to the breakdown of
the component parts, with small slivers inciting the inflammation.
Lead may also cause a synovitis following penetration
of a projectile into a joint or as part of the systemic
manifestations of lead poisoning. The common mechanism
is based on the fact that synovial fluid can act as a
solvent for lead.
The
joints most commonly involved are those unprotected by
clothing. There may be variable degrees of joint swelling,
thickening of the lining of the joint and the development
of an effusion (accumulation of fluid in the joint). On
occasion, patients with foreign body synovitis due to
sea urchin spines or other foreign bodies of animal origin
present with fever, muscle aches (myalgias), swelling
of regional lymph nodes, and -2- synovitis of surrounding
joints. Professional diving, other marine recreational
activities, and gardening are well-recognized risk factors.
The
attending physician must consider other causes of acute
and chronic single joint inflammation as well as different
types of total finger inflammation such as a erysipeloid,
typical and atypical mycobacteria, sarcoidosis, as well
as psoriasis. The latter two diagnoses have been discussed
in prior installments of Rheumors.
Laboratory studies may show synovial fluid that is cloudy
or bloody and have white counts that are in the inflammatory
range between 10,000/60,000 cells per cubic millimeter.
Inflammatory white cells predominate. Cultures for bacteria
and fungi are negative except when an infectious agent
has been introduced along with the foreign body. Fresh
preparations of synovial fluid occasionally may reveal
fragments of plant thorns, plastic, dark metallic particles,
or needle shaped fiberglass.
X-ray studies detect only those foreign bodies that are
radiodense such as metal, fish bone and sea urchin spines,
and usually miss wood, plastic and plant thorns. Treatment
of foreign body synovitis: Approximately 30% of patients
with a foreign body synovitis will resolve spontaneously.
The remaining patients require surgical intervention.
After the surgical removal of the foreign bodies, a few
patients may experience recurrent joint swelling, as well
as new bone formation.
LEAD
ARTICLE
HEALTH CARE REFORM, A PATIENT PRIMER
by Robert L. Rosenberg, M.D.
The
1992 Presidential election placed the issue of health
care reform in sharp national focus. Candidate, and now
President, Bill Clinton, rode the wave of dissatisfaction
with our current health care system to the White House.
We are at a critical juncture with health care reform
no longer just a possibility, but a pending reality. On
May 3, 1993, the 526 member White House Health Reform
Task Force will submit its findings to Congress and the
public. The future they present will both excite and scare
us all.
Few will argue that health care costs are increasing too
rapidly. Currently, 14% of the gross domestic product,
or 1/7th of our entire economy, is devoted to health care.
Adding to this problem, 37 million Americans are without
health care coverage. Those with coverage are often locked
into their jobs because of inability to carry their benefits
with them when they seek other jobs, self-employment,
or retirement. Bankrupt firms leave behind unemployed
and uninsured workers. Hospitals, doctors, and other health
care providers often suffer too by providing uncompensated
or undercompensated care. Anyone who has seen their health
care costs rise by 10% to 20% annually, knows the impact
of this problem first hand. Is this is a crisis? More
to the point, it is a chronic problem recognized by the
medical community for the last twenty years. Health care
costs have been a major topic of discussion by physicians
since the 1970's and my -2- medical insurance was then
only $400 per year! The political atmosphere, the accelerated
growth of costs and the overwhelming budget deficits all
have lead political Washington to discover this "new"
twenty year old problem.
It is clear that medical costs have grown tremendously,
but the reasons are numerous. New technology and new pharmaceuticals
have saved and prolonged lives. The added burden of HIV
related disease, drug, cigarette and alcohol related diseases,
and an aging population, all require more and more complex
care. Patients with end-stage renal and heart disease
are able to survive for years with organ transplants that
were science fiction a few generations ago. Technologies
not even dreamed of 20 years ago are common today - laser
surgery, laparoscopic surgery, coronary artery by-pass
surgery, immune and genetic manipulation, and new imaging
techniques. Also, the public has demanded and received
payment for allied and alternative health care including
massage therapy, chiropractic therapy, herbalist therapy,
nutritional therapy, holistic medicine and others. They
all share in increasing our medical care costs whether
or not you as a consumer use them individually.
Where
can we improve? For a start, we can improve with preventative
care. Weight control, exercise, smoking cessation, reduction
of alcohol consumption, childhood immunizations, prenatal
care, and cholesterol and cancer screening are essential.
We need a system that encourages and pays for these efforts.
The Health Care Task Force recommendations will likely
support a form of "managed competition", a much touted
but little understood concept. Managed competition supports
a system of guaranteed basic health coverage contracted
for by -3- groups of large and small employers who can
negotiate as a group to get the best possible price for
health care services, usually through a managed care operation.
The managed care operation may consist of any of one of
a group of alphabet soup designations (HMO, PPO, IPA)
that offers basic medical services at an agreed upon contract
price. By buying coverage in large groups, costs presumably
can be kept low while preserving access to health care.
Unfortunately, an emphasis on delivery of "quality" health
care is missing.
Advocates of a single payer system point to our northern
neighbor Canada as a model. In Canada the government is
the single payer and administers all health care. While
many Canadians speak highly of their health care system,
many other Canadians seek health care in the USA on a
fee for service basis. Currently the Canadian system,
like ours, is experiencing an explosion in costs, though
the magnitude of their cost rise is not as great as ours.
Regardless
of how you feel about the current system, there are some
basic truths. Eighty percent of Americans want a change
in the health care system and most physicians agree. The
changes will affect all of us. Our new system will initially
be more disruptive and probably more expensive with the
hope that costs can be kept in line in later years. Access
to your family doctor may be sacrificed and your choice
of physician will be limited. Medical care will likely
no longer be "on demand". Everything that we do as physicians
will come under increased scrutiny, often by non-physicians.
We will all face these major changes together with the
goal of providing the best quality care available anywhere.
As
patients and health care consumers, you must be informed
and involved in the decision process. Please write or
call your representatives and tell them what you think
about health care reform. Arthritis & Rheumatism Associates
wants to provide the best health care available under
any system.
RHEUMINATIONS
KEEP IN TOUCH WITH YOUR REPRESENTATIVES
KEY TELEPHONE NUMBERS AND ADDRESSES
Senate and House Bill Status.............202-225-1772
Senate
Addresses
Street addresses in Washington, DC 20510
SD ... Dirksen Building ..............1st & C Sts., NE
SH ... Hart Building..................2nd & C Sts., NE
SR ... Russell Building...............1st & C Sts., NE
S.... Capitol Building
House
Addresses
Street addresses in Washington, DC 20515
Rooms
listed with 3 numbers:
CHOB:
Cannon House Office Bldg.
1st St. & Independence Ave., SE
Rooms listed with 4 numbers beginning with 1:
LHOB:
Longworth House Office Bldg.
Independence & New Jersey Aves., SE
Rooms listed with 4 numbers beginning with 2:
RHOB
Rayburn House Office Bldg.
Independence Ave. & S. Capitol St., SW
Other office buildings:
OHOB (O'Neill).........
New Jersey Ave. & C St., SE
FHOB (Ford)
300 D St., SW
H
Capitol Building
WHEN WRITING, these addresses and salutations are suggested:
The Honorable John Doe
The United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Senator Doe:
The Honorable Jane Doe
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Congresswoman Doe:
TO PHONE Senate and Representative offices directly, dial
202 and the telephone number shown below, opposite the
members names.
Senators
Sen. Paul S. Sarbanes (D)
SH-309 202-224-4524
3rd Term Expires...... 1995
Sen. Barbara A. Mikulski (D)
SH-320 202-224-4654
2nd Term Expires...... 1999
House of Representatives
Wayne Gilchrest (R - 1st) 412
CHOB 202-225-5311
2nd Term
Helen Delich Bently (R - 2nd) 1610
LHOB 202-225-3061
5th Term
Term Benjamin L. Cardin (D - 3rd) 227
CHOB 202-225-4016
4th Term
Albert Wynn (D - 4th) 423
CHOB 202-225-8699
1st Term
Steny H. Hoyer (D - 5th) 1705
LHOB 202-225-4131
7th Term
Roscoe Bartlett (R - 6th) 312
CHOB 202-225-2721
1st Term
Kweisi Mfume (D - 7th) 2419
RHOB 202-225-4741
4th Term
Constance A. Morella (R - 8th) 223
CHOB 202-225-5341
4th Term
QUESTION
& ANSWERS
By Evan L. Siegel, M.D.
| Q. |
I
recently saw a report on television about a new therapy
for arthritis called pulsed electromagnetic field
therapy. Is this really an effective treatment for
arthritis? |
| A. |
Recently
several reports in the media have focused on this
new, potentially beneficial therapy for Osteoarthritis.
These reports were based on a pilot study of 25 patients,
of whom 14 were treated with exposure to Extremely
Low Frequency pulsed magnetic fields, and 11 were
treated with a sham procedure (no therapy, disguised
to appear as if magnetic pulses were being generated).
Benefit was modest in the treated group, with one-quarter
to one-half showing improvement in some symptoms.
The patients treated with the sham procedure also
showed some benefit. It is much too early to draw
any conclusions from such preliminary data based on
so few patients. While some scientific studies based
on animal and test tube models exist which would suggest
a beneficial effect of biomagnetic energy on bone
and cartilage repair, there are no well controlled
studies on human tissue or on sufficient numbers of
patients to make any well informed recommendation.
At this time, this type of experimental treatment
should be restricted only to patients participating
in a study protocol. |
|
|
| Q. |
My
doctor recommended a series of joint x-rays. Will
this amount of radiation harm me? |
| A. |
No.
The radiation used in diagnostic x-rays is very
minimal. The main danger of x-radiation is to the
genetic code of cells that are growing and reproducing.
Tissues such as bone and cartilage, which make up
the joint, reproduce very slowly. This makes them
fairly resistant to any damage from radiation. Even
tissues with more rapid cell turnover and growth,
such as skin, are resistant to the minimal total
radiation dose received from even extensive diagnostic
studies. Of course, very rapidly dividing cells,
such as those in a developing fetus, theoretically
could be damaged which is why x-ray studies are
avoided, if at all possible, during pregnancy. However,
millions of x-rays are taken on a daily basis in
this country alone and there have been no reports
of serious short or long term adverse events as
a result of the careful and thoughtful use of x-radiation
for medical diagnostic imaging.
|
A quarterly
publication brought to you by Arthritis & Rheumatism Associates
Norman S. Koval, M.D. Herbert S. B. Baraf, M.D. Robert L.
Rosenberg, M.D. Evan L. Siegel, M.D. Margaret Dieckhoner,
Editor © 1990 Arthritis & Rheumatism Associates
|